Co-receptor Regulation of TGF-beta Signaling

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta superfamily cytokines play integral parts in cell differentiation and proliferation, and their signaling depends on an intricate spatiotemporal orchestration of protein interactions from membrane to nucleus. In general, a TGF-beta ligand binds with a heteromeric receptor complex consisting of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors that activate smad-dependent gene transcription.1 Rather than a type I/type II receptor combination unique to each ligand, the signaling receptor complexes are composed from a finite group of seven type I (activin-like kinases; ALK) and five type II receptors. This redundancy allows for variation in response depending on ligand presence and/or accessibility. Participating in this regulation are co-receptors, proteins that enable, if not promote, ligand-receptor binding (Figure 1).

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta superfamily cytokines play integral parts in cell differentiation and proliferation, and their signaling depends on an intricate spatiotemporal orchestration of protein interactions from membrane to nucleus. In general, a TGF-beta ligand binds with a heteromeric receptor complex consisting of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors that activate smad-dependent gene transcription.1 Rather than a type I/type II receptor combination unique to each ligand, the signaling receptor complexes are composed from a finite group of seven type I (activin-like kinases; ALK) and five type II receptors. This redundancy allows for variation in response depending on ligand presence and/or accessibility. Participating in this regulation are co-receptors, proteins that enable, if not promote, ligand-receptor binding (Figure 1).

Co-receptors interact with TGF-beta ligand and ligand-binding receptor (Type II for TGF-beta 2 and inhibin, Type I for nodal, BMP) to influence cellular response to ligand.
View Larger Image 		Figure 1. Co-receptors interact with TGF-beta ligand and ligand-binding receptor (Type II for TGF-beta 2 and inhibin, Type I for nodal, BMP) to influence cellular response to ligand. A: Obligate co-receptors permit signal transduction by TGF-beta 2. B: Co-receptors for BMP enhance signal, providing increased sensitivity to low BMP concentration.

Betaglycan, also known as TGF-beta RIII, associates with and presents TGF-beta isoforms to the TGF-beta RII (Type II) receptor.2 Expression of betaglycan increases the sensitivity of TGF-beta RII-expressing cells to TGF-beta 2 and equalizes the affinities across isoforms,3 thus maximizing TGF-beta signaling. Betaglycan also serves as a prerequisite co-receptor for inhibin,4, 5 a molecule known as an activin antagonist. Inhibin (bound to betaglycan) competitively interacts with activin type II receptors without the recruitment and activation of the type I receptor. Considering that both TGF-beta and activin initiate the smad-2/3 pathway, betaglycan's role as a co-receptor can lead to opposing effects on smad-2/3-dependent processes. TGF-beta signaling specificity is also carried out by endoglin (CD105), a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on vascular endothelial cells that facilitates TGF-beta 1/3 binding to TGF-beta RII with preferential recruitment of the type I receptor ALK-1.6 ALK-1 activates smad-1 and indirectly inhibits TGF-beta/ALK-5/smad-2/3 signaling.7 Thus, endoglin appears to moderate a balance between smad-2/3-related cell growth inhibition and smad-1-associated cell proliferation during angiogenesis.6

EGF-CFC proteins are essential for vertebrate development by serving as co-receptors for the embryogenesis-related molecules nodal, vitellogenin (Vg)1, and growth differentiation factor (GDF)-1/3.9, 10, 11 The EGF-CFC protein cripto permits nodal signaling by interacting with both ligand (EGF region) and the type I receptor ALK-4 (CFC region) to form a smad-2-activating Act RIIB-ALK 4-nodal-cripto complex. Cripto also can interact with activin/Act RIIB12 and TGF-beta 1/ TGF-beta RII3 complexes, preventing recruitment and activation of their type 1 receptors, ALK-4 and ALK-5, respectively. Cripto's initiation and disruption of TGF-beta signaling highlight mechanisms for its multifunctional role in embryogenesis and tumorigenesis.

Recently, members of the repulsive guidance molecule (RGM) family of GPI-anchored proteins have been identified as specific co-receptors for the BMP subfamily.14,15, 16, 17 Unlike TGF-beta 2/betaglycan and nodal/cripto, RGM-A-C are not obligate co-receptors for BMP signaling. Rather, they enhance BMP signal transduction through direct interaction with BMP-2/4 and ALK-3/6. This role may provide increased sensitivity to low ligand concentration such as those that may occur in morphogenetic gradients during embryogenesis. This may allow cells to respond at a lower threshold and/or exhibit a greater response. Whether regulation of BMP signaling contributes to RGM-A and RGM-B roles in the developing18, 19 and regenerating20 central nervous system remains to be determined. However, RGM-C (hemojuvelin), as a BMP co-receptor, has been elegantly linked to iron metabolism in vivo and in vitro.17 Further investigation is necessary to elucidate additional roles for the RGM family in TGF-beta signaling.

References

  1. Shi, Y. & J. Massagué (2003) Cell 113:685.
  2. Lopez-Casillas, F. et al. (1993) Cell 73:1435.
  3. Sankar, S. et al. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270:13567.
  4. Lewis, K.A. et al. (2000) Nature 404:411.
  5. Wiater, E. et al. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281:17011.
  6. Lebrin, F. et al. (2004) EMBO J. 23:4018.
  7. Oh, S.P. et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:2626.
  8. Lebrin, F. et.al. (2005) Cardiovasc. Res. 65:599.
  9. Yeo, C.-Y. & M. Whitman (2001) Mol. Cell 7:949.
  10. Cheng, S.K. et al. (2003) Genes Dev. 17:31.
  11. Chen, C. et al. (2006) Development 133:319.
  12. Gray, P.C. et al. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:5193.
  13. Gray, P.C. et al. (2006) Mol. Cell Biol. 26:9268.
  14. Samad, T.A. et al. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280:14122.
  15. Xia, Y. et al. (2005) Endocrinology 146:3614.
  16. Babitt, J.L. et al. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280:29820.
  17. Babitt, J.L. et al. (2006) Nat. Genetics 38:531.
  18. Samad, T.A. et al. (2004) J. Neurosci. 24:2027.
  19. Matsunaga, E. et al. (2006) J. Neurosci. 26:6082.
  20. Hata, K. et al. (2006) J. Cell Biol. 173:47.